
Jose
Mourinho’s own brilliant record means he has little experience of struggling
sides. As a result, it seems the solution is in danger of eluding him,
writes Adam Bate.
There is a joke doing the rounds linking Sam Allardyce with the Chelsea job.
That's how it should stay but it does hint at a truth about the predicament
the club finds itself in. They are just two places above the Premier League
relegation zone. This is a challenge with which Jose Mourinho is unfamiliar.
His own success has precluded such an experience.
Porto were uncharacteristically fifth when he was given the job in 2002 but
Mourinho has not taken over a team outside the top three since. He brought
success to Chelsea but they had finished second in the Premier League and
reached the Champions League semi-finals in the season prior to his first
stint. Inter, meanwhile, were already the champions of Italy.
Real Madrid had finished second - with 96 points and 102 goals - under
Manuel Pellegrini, while Rafael Benitez's Chelsea were the Europa League
champions having finished third in the Premier League. In each case,
Mourinho's brilliance made the team better. But it would be wrong to suggest
these were teams in turmoil prior to his arrival.
When you win and you win titles and you are champion, life is easy.
Mourinho himself seems to acknowledge this is different. It serves as both a
reminder of his record and an admission of his plight. "I get it as a
fantastic experience - an experience that I don't want to repeat," he said
last week. "I think it comes too late, to come after 15 years is too late,
but it's something that is helping me to be better, a great negative
experience."
Put simply, turning things around for a struggling team is a different
challenge altogether. And thus far, Mourinho has given the impression of a
man floundering in search of a solution. There are only so many weapons at
the disposal of a manager in charge of a faltering team and - unfamiliar
with defeat - Mourinho has reached for most of them already. To no avail.
Referees and rivals have been put under the spotlight. The media have been
targeted. It can be assumed that players have been criticised in private
because, for a manager who has often inspired fierce loyalty from his teams,
the surprise decision to go public with his frustration has already
followed.
John Terry has been dropped. Eden Hazard too. Nemanja Matic even suffered
the indignity of being substituted 28 minutes after being introduced from
the bench himself. Perhaps most troubling of all was the decision on the
opening weekend of the season to make Dr Eva Carneiro the subject of his
ire.
Apparently all out of sparring partners, his weekend comments appeared to
aim a dig at the ribs of the one man most likely to dictate how and when
this drama reaches its conclusion. Mourinho chose to switch the attention to
Roman Abramovich and his hire-and-fire policy. "I think this is a crucial
moment in the history of this club," he said.
"Do you know why? Because if the club sacks me, they sack the best manager
that this club had and secondly, the message is again the message that bad
results, the manager is guilty. This is the message that not just these
players but other ones before, that they got during a decade. I think this
is a moment for everybody to assume responsibilities."
It's tempting to conclude that it's the last resort; a plea for patience and
a reminder of his record as "the best manager that this club has had." But
it's also further evidence that nobody - neither employer nor employee - is
safe when it comes to Mourinho's antagonism.
At its best, this ability to thrive on conflict can foster a dynamic working
environment that breeds excellence. At its worst, as appeared to be the case
at Real Madrid, his machinations can exhaust a football club. A siege
mentality only works if the threat is from outside. If it's internal, mutiny
might just be the easier way out.
As Mourinho admits, Chelsea's players could yet be tempted by this
alternative solution. "I think you should go straight to the players. Get a
table at Cobham next week - John Terry doesn't go to the national team,
Diego Costa doesn't go, Ramires doesn't go. Ask them. If they tell you they
don't trust me, that is the only thing that can make me resign."
It's quite the turn of events. "I am so happy with myself with the way I am
facing this," insisted Mourinho, but whether that's a sentiment shared by
anyone else at Stamford Bridge is up for debate. So as the so-called
'specialist in failure' Arsene Wenger safely negotiates his latest
mini-crisis, it's the novice in failure in danger of seeing his first blip
become terminal.